Lorenzo Manta vs Michal Tabara, Chennai 2000, Round of 16
Final score
Final
6-4 6-3Venue and conditions
SDAT Tennis StadiumChennai, IND
Outdoor hardCourt speed99.8Average
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsForecast not yet available
Match stats
1h 16m3Aces3
10Double faults4
39Service points won32
10Service games played9
8Service games won5
9Return games played10
0/20%Break points saved50%4/8
4/850%Break points converted100%2/2
Head to head
1Manta
0Tabara
1 meeting- ChennaiRound of 16 · 2000HardThis matchLorenzo MantaSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Michal TabaraSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3
Form and path
Lorenzo Manta2–4
KitzbuhelClay
StuttgartClay
GstaadClay
- LRound of 32Nicolas LapenttiSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Lorenzo MantaSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
- WQualifying R3Lorenzo MantaSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Nathan HealeySets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3
Michal Tabara4–2
Jablonec nad NisouClay
- LQuarterfinalMartin KlizanSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Michal TabaraSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 0
- WRound of 16Michal TabaraSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Tim Van TerheijdenSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
- WRound of 32Michal TabaraSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Juho PaukkuSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3
MostClay
- LFinalJerzy JanowiczSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Set 3: 7Michal TabaraSets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 63
- WQuarterfinalMichal TabaraSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Andrey KuznetsovSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 61
- WRound of 16Michal TabaraSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Martin EmmrichSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 0
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.